The Sunday Times yesterday produced a supplement "100 Best not-for-profit organisations to work for".
Paces wasn't listed. Why not?
A simple answer would be that we are not big enough. The smallest organisation in the top 100 has 57 employees. Or another reason could be that we were not one of the "254 organisations that took part in the survey" (You've got to be in it to win it!). Or we were not the right sort of organisation: 7 of the top 10 are housing associations and social landlords, which also make up 45 of the top 100. Or, it could be that Paces is just not the right sort of not-for-profit, for which I could not find a definition.
No matter. The criteria by which the Top 100 were uncovered ("voted for by the people that know them best - their workers"), bears close examination. So how would you score your conductive education organisation on the following 7 factors:
- Leadership: how employees feel about the way the organisation is run from the top
- Wellbeing: how staff feel about the impact their work has on their quality of life
- My Team: employees' feelings about their immediate colleagues
- Fair Deal: how the workforce perceives the fairness of their rewards
- Giving Something Back: the extent to which employees feel their organisation has a positive impact on society
- My Company: how emotionally connected emplyees feel towards their organisation
- Personal Growth: whether people feel challenged by work, how their skills are being used and scope for advancement.
For each of the Top 45 there was additionally listed:
- Male/female ratio
- Average age
- Staff turnover
- %-age earning over £35,000
It would be a worthwhile exercise to assess the averages but I don't have the free time it would take.
The profiles make interesting reading. What caught my eye?
Ranked 2. P3 a social enterprise charity harnesses the skills of former clients: more than 30% of employees have experience of mental illness or being homeless.
At 19: KeyRing Living Support Networks, helping people with learning difficulties to live independently as full citizens.
At 52: Rainbow Children's Charity, supports families who have a child with a life-limiting or terminal illness.
At 69: Goodwin Development Trust, improving life in Hull by tackling social problems.
At 70: St Loyes Foundation, in Exeter, trains more than 1,000 people including service veterans for independence.
I asked here a couple of days ago, "Why aren't we being more radical?" and then "Are we being crazy enough?" (to which James Forliti replied in a Comment "Hear, hear!! Yeah, where is the next batch of rabble-rousers?" Spot on, James.)
Radical? Crazy? Now, I ask if we are ambitious enough? Why shouldn't Paces aspire to be one of the best 100 not-for-profits to work for? The survey for the 2013 Top 100 has already opened.

